Sunday, June 1, 2014

Don’t want to live under Articles of Confederation?: VOTE!

Warning ~ I’m feeling very snarky  …

 
If you want to continue to live under the UNITED STATES Constitution of America and if don’t want to live under a GOP version of the Articles of Confederation  V-O-T-E and make sure a Republican is never, ever  elected to a position of power in this nation again…
 
I cannot say with certainty what a final version of the new GOP framework for this land will look like if they win the Senate in 2014 and the White House in 2016 but I can make an educated guess as their favorite parts of the Articles of Confederation are that the States are Sovereign, that The People are Armed and that the Federal Government is, basically, a Solver of Disputes Between Said States.
 
Picture it:


Let’s take the Keystone XL Pipeline as a simple example ~ Canada wants the pipeline to run through the United States. Texas wants it to run through the United States, too. The problem is environmentalists believe the pipeline is hazardous to the health of the entire planet and a whole lot of citizens in Nebraska believe their water source is directly threatened so they are all fighting the building of the pipeline together.
 
In a Brand New GOP world this issue would still tick off Texas, Montana, Oklahoma, Missouri, Arkansas, Kansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana, of course, so they would likely form a pro-KXL Pipeline Alliance, they would likely tell the environmentalists and the citizens of Nebraska to STFU! and with great glee they would likely send their State Militias out to secure the building of the pipeline ~ perhaps even changing state boundaries to reach their objective... what's to stop them?
 
Then what ~ you are probably asking right about now? Well, war between some of our states, of course. It's a natural GOP progression. 
 
(That should give you a pretty clear image of how our Non-United States. Survival of the fittest, codified! Plug in your own example and see where it takes you via the new Government of your State, depending on what State you live in of course. Some states might keep the systems they have now or they might become Libertarian or Oligarchy or even Direct Democracy ~ who knows?)




Now. To be fair. The 1781 Articles of Confederation did give Congress the power to make treaties, maintain an army and coin money but I suspect those chores would all be gone  following a GOP Constitutional Convention immediately after the 2016 Election except for, maybe,  protection of borders and creation of worldwide empire, perhaps.
 
Here’s a look at the document the GOP reveres more than the U.S. Constitution. It has been edited by me to highlight the most ludicrous and chaotic and to strengthen my argument that Democrats must get out and vote and they must vote Democrat!:

Edited Version: The  ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION
 
To all to whom these Presents shall come, we the undersigned Delegates of the States affixed to our Names send greeting.

Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts-bay Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.

One

The Stile of this Confederacy shall be

"The United States of America".

Two

Each state retains its sovereignty (And there it is. Right up front. End of story, really, but I’ll continue to play.), freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

Three

The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other (friendship, that’ll work with a lying cheating GOP, right?), for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever. (It is interesting to note the general welfare is included here ~ that’ll change!)

Four

The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted (and we can, surely, expect that exception list to grow ~ it’s been a long time since that list was made…), shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the property of the United States, or either of them.

If any person guilty of, or charged with, treason, felony, or other high misdemeanor in any State, shall flee from justice, and be found in any of the United States, he shall, upon demand of the Governor or executive power of the State from which he fled, be delivered up and removed to the State having jurisdiction of his offense.

Full faith and credit shall be given in each of these States to the records, acts, and judicial proceedings of the courts and magistrates of every other State.

Five

For the most convenient management of the general interests of the United States, delegates shall be annually appointed in such manner as the legislatures of each State shall direct, to meet in Congress on the first Monday in November, in every year, with a power reserved to each State to recall its delegates, or any of them, at any time within the year, and to send others in their stead for the remainder of the year. (I severely cut this one re more boring management stuff… see link above. Just note ~ power in the State, not The People.)

Six

(Also severely cut for purposes of relevancy to me…see link above.)
No two or more States shall enter into any treaty, confederation or alliance whatever between them, without the consent of the United States in Congress assembled, specifying accurately the purposes for which the same is to be entered into, and how long it shall continue. (Sorry, this is exactly the kind of stuff that totally defeats the purpose of the UNITED STATES and it is why I now call the GOP anti-U.S. Government because they are!)

No State shall lay any imposts or duties, which may interfere with any stipulations in treaties, entered into by the United States in Congress assembled, with any King, Prince or State, in pursuance of any treaties already proposed by Congress, to the courts of France and Spain.

No vessel of war shall be kept up in time of peace by any State, except such number only, as shall be deemed necessary by the United States in Congress assembled, for the defense of such State, or its trade; nor shall any body of forces be kept up by any State in time of peace, except such number only, as in the judgement of the United States in Congress assembled, shall be deemed requisite to garrison the forts necessary for the defense of such State; but every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of filed pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and camp equipage. (And there it is, guns for all, although interestingly enough it does still say REGULATED.)

No State shall engage in any war without the consent of the United States in Congress assembled, UNLESS such State be actually invaded by enemies, or shall have received certain advice of a resolution being formed by some nation of Indians to invade such State, and the danger is so imminent as not to admit of a delay till the United States in Congress assembled can be consulted (Awesome. There are some times States can declare war!); nor shall any State grant commissions to any ships or vessels of war, nor letters of marque or reprisal, except it be after a declaration of war by the United States in Congress assembled, and then only against the Kingdom or State and the subjects thereof, against which war has been so declared, and under such regulations as shall be established by the United States in Congress assembled, UNLESS such State be infested by pirates, in which case vessels of war may be fitted out for that occasion, and kept so long as the danger shall continue, or until the United States in Congress assembled shall determine otherwise. (Oh good, more war stuff the States can do!)

Seven

When land forces are raised by any State for the common defense, all officers of or under the rank of colonel, shall be appointed by the legislature of each State respectively, by whom such forces shall be raised, or in such manner as such State shall direct, and all vacancies shall be filled up by the State which first made the appointment. (Ugh.)
 
Eight

All charges of war, and all other expenses that shall be incurred for the common defense or general welfare, and allowed by the United States in Congress assembled, shall be defrayed out of a common treasury, which shall be supplied by the several States in proportion to the value of all land within each State, granted or surveyed for any person, as such land and the buildings and improvements thereon shall be estimated according to such mode as the United States in Congress assembled, shall from time to time direct and appoint. (I can see a war breaking out between some States over this…)
The taxes for paying that proportion shall be laid and levied by the authority and direction of the legislatures of the several States within the time agreed upon by the United States in Congress assembled.

Nine

(Also severely cut for purposes of relevancy to me… see link above.)
The United States in Congress assembled shall also be the last resort on appeal in all disputes and differences now subsisting or that hereafter may arise between two or more States concerning boundary, jurisdiction or any other causes whatever; which authority shall always be exercised in the manner following. (Good Grief! I don’t think a real justice system has been mentioned yet!) >>> It’s a slog but we need to grasp the chaos that ensued and we need to imagine how much worse it can get… Whenever the legislative or executive authority or lawful agent of any State in controversy with another shall present a petition to Congress stating the matter in question and praying for a hearing, notice thereof shall be given by order of Congress to the legislative or executive authority of the other State in controversy, and a day assigned for the appearance of the parties by their lawful agents, who shall then be directed to appoint by joint consent, commissioners or judges to constitute a court for hearing and determining the matter in question: but if they cannot agree, Congress shall name three persons out of each of the United States, and from the list of such persons each party shall alternately strike out one, the petitioners beginning, until the number shall be reduced to thirteen; and from that number not less than seven, nor more than nine names as Congress shall direct, shall in the presence of Congress be drawn out by lot, and the persons whose names shall be so drawn or any five of them, shall be commissioners or judges, to hear and finally determine the controversy, so always as a major part of the judges who shall hear the cause shall agree in the determination: and if either party shall neglect to attend at the day appointed, without showing reasons, which Congress shall judge sufficient, or being present shall refuse to strike, the Congress shall proceed to nominate three persons out of each State, and the secretary of Congress shall strike in behalf of such party absent or refusing; and the judgement and sentence of the court to be appointed, in the manner before prescribed, shall be final and conclusive; and if any of the parties shall refuse to submit to the authority of such court, or to appear or defend their claim or cause, the court shall nevertheless proceed to pronounce sentence, or judgement, which shall in like manner be final and decisive, the judgement or sentence and other proceedings being in either case transmitted to Congress, and lodged among the acts of Congress for the security of the parties concerned: provided that every commissioner, before he sits in judgement, shall take an oath to be administered by one of the judges of the supreme or superior court of the State, where the cause shall be tried, 'well and truly to hear and determine the matter in question, according to the best of his judgement, without favor, affection or hope of reward': provided also, that no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States.

All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more States, whose jurisdictions as they may respect such lands, and the States which passed such grants are adjusted, the said grants or either of them being at the same time claimed to have originated antecedent to such settlement of jurisdiction, shall on the petition of either party to the Congress of the United States, be finally determined as near as may be in the same manner as is before presecribed for deciding disputes respecting territorial jurisdiction between different States.

The United States in Congress assembled shall also have the sole and exclusive right and power of regulating the alloy and value of coin struck by their own authority, or by that of the respective States -- fixing the standards of weights and measures throughout the United States -- regulating the trade and managing all affairs with the Indians, not members of any of the States, provided that the legislative right of any State within its own limits be not infringed or violated -- establishing or regulating post offices from one State to another, throughout all the United States, and exacting such postage on the papers passing through the same as may be requisite to defray the expenses of the said office -- appointing all officers of the land forces, in the service of the United States, excepting regimental officers -- appointing all the officers of the naval forces, and commissioning all officers whatever in the service of the United States -- making rules for the government and regulation of the said land and naval forces, and directing their operations.


The United States in Congress assembled shall have authority to appoint a committee, to sit in the recess of Congress, to be denominated 'A Committee of the States', and to consist of one delegate from each State; and to appoint such other committees and civil officers as may be necessary for managing the general affairs of the United States under their direction -- to appoint one of their members to preside, provided that no person be allowed to serve in the office of president more than one year in any term of three years; to ascertain the necessary sums of money to be raised for the service of the United States, and to appropriate and apply the same for defraying the public expenses -- to borrow money, or emit bills on the credit of the United States, transmitting every half-year to the respective States an account of the sums of money so borrowed or emitted -- to build and equip a navy -- to agree upon the number of land forces, and to make requisitions from each State for its quota, in proportion to the number of white inhabitants in such State; which requisition shall be binding, and thereupon the legislature of each State shall appoint the regimental officers, raise the men and cloath, arm and equip them in a solid-like manner, at the expense of the United States; and the officers and men so cloathed, armed and equipped shall march to the place appointed, and within the time agreed on by the United States in Congress assembled. But if the United States in Congress assembled shall, on consideration of circumstances judge proper that any State should not raise men, or should raise a smaller number of men than the quota thereof, such extra number shall be raised, officered, cloathed, armed and equipped in the same manner as the quota of each State, unless the legislature of such State shall judge that such extra number cannot be safely spread out in the same, in which case they shall raise, officer, cloath, arm and equip as many of such extra number as they judeg can be safely spared. And the officers and men so cloathed, armed, and equipped, shall march to the place appointed, and within the time agreed on by the United States in Congress assembled.

Ten

The Committee of the States, or any nine of them, shall be authorized to execute, in the recess of Congress, such of the powers of Congress as the United States in Congress assembled, by the consent of the nine States, shall from time to time think expedient to vest them with; provided that no power be delegated to the said Committee, for the exercise of which, by the Articles of Confederation, the voice of nine States in the Congress of the United States assembled be requisite. (Good Grief!)

Eleven

(How very, very interesting.) Canada acceding to this confederation, and adjoining in the measures of the United States, shall be admitted into, and entitled to all the advantages of this Union; but no other colony shall be admitted into the same, unless such admission be agreed to by nine States.

Twelve

All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered as a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pleged.

Thirteen

Every State shall abide by the determination of the United States in Congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them. And the Articles of this Confederation shall be inviolably observed by every State, and the Union shall be perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any time hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a Congress of the United States, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures of every State.

And Whereas it hath pleased the Great Governor of the World to incline the hearts of the legislatures we respectively represent in Congress, to approve of, and to authorize us to ratify the said Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union.  (Whaaat???) Know Ye that we the undersigned delegates, by virtue of the power and authority to us given for that purpose, do by these presents, in the name and in behalf of our respective constituents, fully and entirely ratify and confirm each and every of the said Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, and all and singular the matters and things therein contained: And we do further solemnly plight and engage the faith of our respective constituents, that they shall abide by the determinations of the United States in Congress assembled, on all questions, which by the said Confederation are submitted to them. And that the Articles thereof shall be inviolably observed by the States we respectively represent, and that the Union shall be perpetual.

In Witness whereof we have hereunto set our hands in Congress. Done at Philadelphia in the State of Pennsylvania the ninth day of July in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy-Eight, and in the Third Year of the independence of America.
Agreed to by Congress 15 November 1777 In force after ratification by Maryland, 1 March 1781

As weaknesses showed themselves, our Founding Fathers decided on a re-do.

Some of ~
 


And the GOP has been fighting to undo it ever since...



V-O-T-E or F-O-R-E-V-E-R hold your P-E-A-C-E !!!

Sunday, May 25, 2014

DEAR JOE SCARBOROUGH: RE UNITEBLUE ~ FREE SPEECH THAT IS NOT TRUE MUST HAVE CONSEQUENCES…

Update re Joe Scarborough responds to critics of his inaccurate UniteBlueCommentary:

*** I am not usually one to go after the hide of those who are in a field broadly covered by the 1st Amendment, in fact I usually love to hear free speech so we-all know where we all stand with each other. But I do feel we need to stand up and talk back to professionals, especially, who work under the auspices of the 1st Amendment when they don't speak the truth to the best of their ability. And, it was Scarborough's inattention to that responsibility, re UniteBlue, that prompted me to join in the effort to call him out on it. The simple fact is -- media gives us our 1st draft of history and it is critical to our participation as citizens in this country that those in that field respect the constitutional gift they have been given and that they go to the source of their subject matter for confirmation ~ or not ~ and/or Google it! Having said that, we are all flawed, including Joe, and Morning Joe has attempted to rectify the error of his ways and you should know that. Here's what he said this a.m.:


(WARNING: If you are not following MSNBC faux political commentator Joe Scarborough and his recent attack on the entire UniteBlue membership you will have some catching up to do before understanding the issue and/or before deciding to take recommended action [below] ~ or not.)

My point of view, Joe Scarborough (aka lead pundit on the GOP front show Morning Joe/aka Dear Right Wing Leader), is a primary consequence of free speech that is not true must be that it’s lack of factual evidence is challenged with Truth ~ as UniteBlue Members are doing as we speak today in response to your attacks on them in recent days. 

And, huge props to them for taking you on! They are your consequence!!!

 In the case of real journalism, reporting is the first draft of history for readers for eternity, therefore, serious inaccuracies cannot be allowed to stand!




 *** Excerpt of what UniteBlue reported to its membership on May 23, 2014 re Joe Scarborough attack on the group:                             

This morning Joe Scarborough of MSNBC’s Morning Joe voiced his distraught disdain for progressives, liberals and Democrats daring to organize under the banner of #UniteBlue. …
… After displaying his willful ignorance of normal, hardworking Americans, Joe Scarborough owes an apology to the mothers, fathers, retirees, millennials, activists, professionals and all other members of UniteBlue. Calling tens of thousands of good, decent people ‘freaks’ is a sweeping condemnation and makes you a hate monger. …




*** Excerpt of what Joe Scarborough said about UniteBlue, with focus on attack and not context ~ hit link below for the entire segment:
  
This morning Joe Scarborough of MSNBC’s Morning Joe voiced his distraught disdain for progressives, liberals and Democrats daring to organize under the banner of #UniteBlue.


“I could just take people who use the hashtag #UniteBlue and make a sweeping condemnation about America’s labor movement if I wanted to, but I don’t because I know that these people are on the fringes; they’re freaks; they’re hate mongers; that there are a lot of people who are in America’s union movements that are good, decent, hardworking people who actually would agree with me on a lot of issues.”  5/23/2014





*** Background reading material, i.e. go to the source ***:






*** Action you can take, if you are so inclined! ***:





*** AND add #SayItAintSoJoe to your Tweet so we can all read it !!!



Sunday, May 18, 2014

I abhor Democrats who risk Democrats losing to the GOP in November via Disingenuous calls for action

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


I am not going to name names because this is not a court of law and I am not making a legal case,

I am merely pointing out an example, recently received in my inbox, where a call for presidential action (in regard to Net Neutrality) clearly demonstrates how some political directors of some advocacy organizations ask their members to take action that is absolutely not doable by the target and because they are asking anyway their motivation needs to be questioned and/or the work needs to proceed without them ~

particularly in a case like the one you will see in the e-mail below calling for action based on the false premise that the action being asked of the President is doable ~ because it is not ~ but it does cast him in a negative light and risks a negative impact on the his favorable numbers which most advocacy/political operatives know is a critical factor in winning in November.

FYI: Independent Agencies are created by Congress via statutes ~ not by Presidents because they are INDEPENDENT…

And, BTW, before we get into more detail and I risk losing you, let me give you a to-do list you can use to take action on your own, re Net Neutrality, without any worries about the axes some organizations may have to grind:

To Do:

Create the message you’d like to send the FCC ~ where the power lies to solve the issue of concern re, in this case, Net Neutrality.

Then:

Comment on the FCC public comments site:   http://www.fcc.gov/comments

E-mail them at: openinternetfcc.gov

Tweet them at: @FCC

Tweet the FCC Chairmen at: @TomWheelerFCC

Call them: 1-202-418-1000

Fax them: 1-866-418-0232


I highly recommend doing all of the above. Personally, I love the imagery of all modes of communication humming in the offices of those who need to hear what We The People have to say! 

Moving on ~ Via editing and paraphrasing I have disguised the e-mail as the agency that sent it to me is only one out of many who offend me with their disingenuous-ness. But, the pitch is, as follows:


May XX, 2014

Gail –

On Thursday, President Obama's recently appointed FCC Chair made a proposal that might give internet providers the right to build fast lanes for some and slow lanes for everybody else.

Over the next two months, the FCC is asking the public to comment on which option to adopt: A two-tiered internet that favors those who can pay for it or one that maintains a level playing field for all.


Concerned citizens have been weighing in.

But, the President’ voice has been missing.

And progressive organizations are now asking the President to take a stand against the corporate takeover of our internet. (Next line you can click to sign a petition asking POTUS to NOT kill the internet, as if he I working to kill the internet, etc…) And then there is that stuff they says he was for it and now he’s weak on it and The People must make him understand…




XXXX XXXX, Political Director
 for XXXXXXXX

FYI: President Obama cannot direct an INDEPENDENT agency to do anything…


For the record, I support Net Neutrality but that does not mean I should be ignorant as to how my own system of government works and it does not mean I should blindly follow the lead of advocacy agencies, some of whom appear to be misleading.

Further, it does not mean that I should not question the motives of advocacy agencies that are not working on behalf of The People in the context of fairness to the President and Democrats winning in November.

Otherwise, I may be working for the right cause but I am also may be undermining my President which only serves to undermine the November election.

I don’t know the why ~ I just know I am not doing it.

So, here’s what I am going to do ~ I have provided you with a to-do list, I’m going to provide you with links to some very valuable information and I’m going to star where the President’s voice has been heard – in case you’d like to know more on this particular subject:

Relevant links:

FCC leadership:   http://www.fcc.gov/leadership



An interesting bit of video by the previous FCC Chairman talking about the court decision that has caused the problem:   http://youtu.be/5aiRoZ63UtE

The decision:   http://youtu.be/5aiRoZ63UtE

FAQ’s re the previous FCC Chairman’s idea ~ A Third Way: http://www.broadband.gov/legal-framework-faq-on-the-third-way.html

A good website, seems to be the work of the previous FCC Chairman:   http://www.broadband.gov/

*** POTUS Administration response to a We The People Petition ~ February 2014:   http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/02/17/we-people-response-reaffirming-white-houses-commitment-net-neutrality


*** In 2011, POTUS directs Executive Agencies to (and I summarize and I paraphrase) work on behalf of The People in all things:   http://www.regblog.org/2011/07/obama-directs-independent-regulatory-agencies.html


***Almost immediately afterwards he clarifies re the independence of the agencies: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/11/memorandum-regulation-and-independent-regulatory-agencies

And, last but not least, POTUS wants We The People to weigh in because he knows who he represents and because it gives him leverage to get it done.

 So ~




Sunday, May 11, 2014

The Obama Doctrine is: The Common Good (Globally)...

Well, it is a little bit more complex than that ^^^ , of course. It's actually: "COMMON SECURITY FOR OUR COMMON HUMANITY" (Translation: If we all work for the Common Good on a global level we will all be better off!)

How can I know that? I'll bet you are wondering about that right now... 

After all, the GOP has no clue ~ they just have a string of hateful words for a foreign policy that doesn't even exist in the one brain they share. And media buys into GOP propaganda that things like a slip of the tongue by SOS John Kerry accidentally persuaded Syria to give up chemical weapons.

But. it's really not all that difficult ~ not if you really follow President Obama. I really follow him because I would not have voted for a President I wasn't fairly certain shared my overarching principles and because I know actions speak louder than words.

I read candidate Obama's "Renewing American Leadership," written in 2007:



I knew a long time ago he was talking about the "visionary leadership" that was being called for "in the twenty-first century -- a vision that draws from the past but is not bound by outdated thinking." Not leading from behind but leading differently.

I knew a long time ago he was talking about how we may be tempted to withdraw from the world, about how that would be a mistake, about how "America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, and the world cannot meet them without America" and about how the "... mission of the United States is to provide global leadership grounded in the understanding that the world shares a common security and a common humanity. .."

And, I thought at the time ~ well, all right, let's rock on ... 



But, of course, I am not an obamabot ~


1. A person who supports Obama and is willing to vote for him but doesn't know a thing about him.
2. It's just a label for someone who doesn't know anything about Obama. You call them a Obamabot because they just spew out their support but have nothing else to show. )

so I thought I'd reserve judgment. I'd wait to read his National Security Agenda and to hear from the implementer of his foreign policy, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton  , before deciding I really understood the Obama Doctrine and before deciding if I really agreed ~ or not.

Of course, soon after Barack Obama was elected as the President of the United States the Republican Party made a political, strategic decision to nullify him and the millions of Americans who voted for him ~ making it impossible, I knew the moment that information was revealed, for the Obama Administration to fully implement his 21st Century Foreign Policy for the benefit of the American People. A tragedy for us...


Nonetheless, after reading candidate Barack Obama's Summer 2007 piece and his May 2010 National Strategy Agenda and after listening Secretary of State Hillary Clinton elaborate on his Foreign Policy at the Council of Foreign Affairs I was on board.

Then came the Secretary of State's December 2010 Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review: Leading Through Civilian Power and I was really sold on the infrastructure being built to support the Obama Doctrine ~ even if it meant not having it all under the GOP nullification of a duly elected American President. It was worth the effort and it was worth getting done as much as could possible get done in the time he had.


"The Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review provides a blueprint for elevating American "civilian power" to better advance our national interests and to be a better partner to the U.S. military. Leading through civilian power means directing and coordinating the resources of all America's civilian agencies to prevent and resolve conflicts; help countries lift themselves out of poverty into prosperous, stable, and democratic states; and build global coalitions to address global problems." 
... A cost-effective investment for the American people; A powerful tool for preventing armed conflict and managing crises ; A catalyst to spur economic growth, open markets for U.S. goods and create jobs at home; and  A necessary response to the complex nature of the problems of the 21st century. ..."

Simply put ~ The Obama Doctrine is: We are all in this together and the United States is not going to police the world alone unless there is absolutely no alternative and in the meantime, let's get this global economy working for everyone!

If you'd like to be more informed than the GOP and the media, Secretary of State John Kerry is currently overseeing a 2014 Review. You can read about the launch of it here.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Question: Does good always win? My guy doesn't know!!!





The good news is 69,498,516 people voted for Obama/Biden 2008; 59,948,323 voted for McCain and Palin. 

The bad news is that 59,948,323 Americans believed that John McCain AND Sarah Palin could both be President of the United States. 

More bad news is that 739,034 thought it was okay to vote for Ralph Nader (Independent); 523,715 thought it was okay to vote for Bob Barr (Libertarian); 161,797 thought it was okay to vote for Cynthia McKinney (Green) and; 242,685 thought it was okay to vote “other.”

(And, just for the record, 199,750 voted for Chuck Baldwin (Constitution) but they don’t count for purpose of this discussion because their votes are for secession from the Union so they are never, ever going to do the right thing.)

On the surface it appears as if wasting one’s vote for a noble purpose in a presidential election does no harm BUT that will not be true in the mid-term election in November when the numbers will be a lot tighter than they were in 2008 (or even 2012).

This is not a scientific study, this is just me pondering some of the numbers I come across here and there that make me question what seems to be a prevailing attitude "out there" that the "Tea Party" is just a "fringe element" of the GOP ~ the implication being not to worry ~ but the numbers I see defy that prevailing attitude ... they are ALL GOP and more than a few people vote for them when they run for office!

Just for the fun of it, let's take a look at some of those numbers:

This post, excerpted from Palin's Facebook Page and edited a smidgen for space, posted on her page on April 26. As of may 2, 17,134 people had Liked what she had to say!

In her home state of Alaska presidential election numbers went like this: GOP (2008, 193,841; 2012, 164,676) and Democrats (2008, 122,640; 2012, 123,595).


This post, excerpted from Cruz's Facebook Page posted on his page on May 2. As of a couple of hours of posting 5,391 people Liked what he had to say!

In his home state of Texas presidential election numbers went like this: GOP (2008, 4,467,748; 2012, 4,555,799) and Democrats (2008, 3,521,164; 2012, 3,294,440). 


This post, excerpted from Ayn Rand Org, posted on the page May, 1 As of May 2 5,224 Liked it!

Purely for informational purposes, registered Libertarian voters in the 30 sates where voters can register by party there is a combined total of 330,811 voters registered under the party. 
.             



And all of that makes me feel quite uncertain as to the veracity of the statement noted above: 
“…The good outnumber you and always will.” 

Is it true?



(Also, see 2012 Registration totals at Ballot Access News December 1, 2012,  p.3.)